Last updated: August 2026. Explore our transparent, double-blind peer-review workflow designed to uphold scientific rigor.
Manuscripts are checked for formatting guidelines and run through similarity index software. Papers exceeding a 10% plagiarism threshold are returned.
The manuscript is anonymized and assigned to at least two independent peer reviewers within the relevant field of study.
Reviewers evaluate originality, technical soundness, methodology, and relevance, submitting recommendations: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
The Editor-in-Chief reviews the recommendations and issues a decision. Revision requests are sent back to the corresponding author for modifications.
Accepted articles are formatted, proofed, assigned a Crossref DOI, and published online on the journal's official archives.